On 29/08/2022 10.12, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
On 29/08/2022 09.21, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 28/8/22 18:25, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
f36, just updated and received thunderbird-librnp-rnp-102.2.0-1.fc36.x86_64
from thunderbird-91.12.0-1.fc36.x86_64
tb brings up the expected display but no input is accepted. The process is shown as running with 100% CPU
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
72149 eyal 20 0 4075036 772700 223612 R 100.3 2.4 5:26.57 thunderbird
It will not refresh(*) the panel and will start responding after about 1h.
[later] I see the panel was refreshed after 50m
but input was still not accepted and the display will not refresh. It resolved after 70m.
After this is seems to be OK, I can read mail etc.
To be sure, I made a copy of the profile where I deleted all the .msf files and observed the same thing.
I tried this a few times.
It is not just a one-off post-upgrade process. After it recovers and works, if I shut tb down and launch it
then it repeats the problem.
There are not too many emails here, maybe a few tens of thousand totaling just over 1GB (a few mailing lists).
My main mail client is on another machine, still running tb 91, and not showing this problem.
Searching the 'net I did not find a relevant report, where should I look?
Hi, I used TB Daily which is V106.0a1 and I don't notice this problem, but TB is a bit slow to shutdown. Just a silly question, have you tried V102 with a brand new empty profile, just to eliminate a corrupt configuration?
Not silly. I just tried it and it started OK, though (as usual) had a short (<10s) pause after the
first mail fetch.
I now ran it from cli and I notice these messages after the short pause:
[Parent 3847044, Main Thread] WARNING: Failed to connect to proxy: 'glib warning', file /builddir/build/BUILD/thunderbird-102.2.0/toolkit/xre/nsSigHandlers.cpp:167
(thunderbird:3847044): libnotify-WARNING **: 10:43:36.102: Failed to connect to proxy
This followed the arrival of one new message, which was visible after the pause resolved.
I then decided to see if the junk folder is leading to some issue. Using my regular profile I moved all
the junk to a temporary folder, then restarted. 10 minutes later it is still on 100% CPU :-(
If this is related, is there a way to clear the junk mail database? I assume that just removing the messages
does not do that. I can later mark the temporary folder messages as junk to teach it again.
Eyal
regards,
Steve
BTW, after reading the release notes, seeing the structural changes, I wonder if it is at all possible
to downgrade to v91?
TIA
(*) "not refreshed" means the panel is not painted after minimize/restore, showing only a border.
--
Eyal Lebedinsky (fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
