Re: Firefox issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/7/22 23:14, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 8/7/22 07:37, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
Am 07.08.2022 um 15:53 schrieb Sam Varshavchik:
Tim via users writes:

Loading:  https://esupport.gigabyte.com/
Brings up:  https://esupport.gigabyte.com/Login/Index?ReturnUrl=%2f

As an aside, I've written off Gigabyte as damaged goods. Their tech support refuses to give you support if you tell them you're running Linux on their motherboards. Their hardware is MS-Windows only.

Letting the server send its own root of the certificate chain of trust is questionable. Trouble making is the fact that the certificate differs from the Mozilla trust store.

Sent from the server:
TWCA Global Root CA
Fingerprint SHA256: 8ad47f6d70a44fa80af0f931125ffe3a76876ffad219a4d40a13c038dc85e69e
Pin SHA256: xES1tmzl1x4bXkDyc4XJXL/SSgW1b3DKwJkvD1DDN5w=
RSA 4096 bits (e 65537) / SHA256withRSA

In the Mozilla trust store:
TWCA Global Root CA   Self-signed
Fingerprint SHA256: 59769007f7685d0fcd50872f9f95d5755a5b2b457d81f3692b610a98672f0e1b
Pin SHA256: xES1tmzl1x4bXkDyc4XJXL/SSgW1b3DKwJkvD1DDN5w=
RSA 4096 bits (e 65537) / SHA256withRSA

https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=esupport.gigabyte.com&hideResults=on


I think it's something to do with this.  There's also:
4     Sent by server
In trust store     TWCA Root Certification Authority   Self-signed
Fingerprint SHA256: bfd88fe1101c41ae3e801bf8be56350ee9bad1a6b9bd515edc5c6d5b8711ac44
Pin SHA256: ksRoeWJu8swezqUMcvteOFhECV8hy/Oyg8uC5rn8alg=
RSA 2048 bits (e 65537) / SHA1withRSA
Weak or insecure signature, but no impact on root certificate

The fingerprint doesn't match the one in the Firefox trust store.
The first chain seems valid, but not the second one.  I'm not a certificate expert, so I don't know what the implications are.  However, someone else posted that a newer Firefox version worked, so maybe it's been resolved in some way.

This is the latest one in the repo and the one
I am now on:

$ rpm -qa firefox
firefox-103.0.1-2.fc36.x86_64

The guy that got it to run was running 105,
which did not come from the repo.  Only
the repo's firefoxes are having this issue.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux