Issue with split DNS and systemd-resolved

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



After Upgrading to Fedora 35 split DNS resolution with systemd-resolved doesn't work anymore.

My Fedora server managed a libvirt virtual network for internal communicatin between VMs. Systemd doesn't work nicely with libvirt, among others does libvirt manage virtual networks directly and doesn't involve NetworkManager. So I had to adjust systemd-resolved using resolvectl. 

I guess I miss something but can't find useful information so far. 


My configuration in detail:


My interfaces

> - - - - - - - - - - - <
$ip a
2: enp0s31f6: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 90:1b:0e:fc:ee:d2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 78.46....
    inet6 2a01:4f8:....
15: virbr0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 8000 ...
    inet 192.168....
17: virbr1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 8000 q....
    inet 192.168.100..... virbr1
> - - - - - - - - - - - <


I configured DNS für each virtual network and if I address the corresponding DNS servers directly ("dig  @192.168.122.1  myhost.example.com") the DNS resolution works correctly.

After boot I get:


> - - - - - - - - - - - <
[~]# resolvectl status
Global
       Protocols: LLMNR=resolve -mDNS -DNSOverTLS DNSSEC=no/unsupported
resolv.conf mode: stub

Link 2 (enp0s31f6)
    Current Scopes: DNS LLMNR/IPv4 LLMNR/IPv6
         Protocols: +DefaultRoute +LLMNR -mDNS -DNSOverTLS DNSSEC=no/unsupported
Current DNS Server: 213.133.98.98
       DNS Servers: 213.133.98.98 213.133.99.99 213.133.100.100 2a01:4f8:0:1::add:1010 2a01:4f8:0:1::add:9999

Link 3 (virbr0)
Current Scopes: none
     Protocols: -DefaultRoute +LLMNR -mDNS -DNSOverTLS DNSSEC=no/unsupported

Link 9 (virbr1)
Current Scopes: none
     Protocols: -DefaultRoute +LLMNR -mDNS -DNSOverTLS DNSSEC=no/unsupported
> - - - - - - - - - - - <


That is as expected.

Until before the update I had to:


> - - - - - - - - - - - <
resolvectl domain virbr0 ~resdigita.lan
resolvectl dns virbr0 192.168.122.1
resolvectl default-route virbr0 false

resolvectl domain virbr1 ~libreccm.lan
resolvectl dns virbr1 192.168.100.1
resolvectl default-route virbr1 false
> - - - - - - - - - - - <



and it worked. But now that results in:



> - - - - - - - - - - - <
[~]# resolvectl status
Global
       Protocols: LLMNR=resolve -mDNS -DNSOverTLS DNSSEC=no/unsupported
resolv.conf mode: stub

Link 2 (enp0s31f6)
    Current Scopes: DNS LLMNR/IPv4 LLMNR/IPv6
         Protocols: +DefaultRoute +LLMNR -mDNS -DNSOverTLS DNSSEC=no/unsupported
Current DNS Server: 213.133.98.98
       DNS Servers: 213.133.98.98 213.133....

Link 3 (virbr0)
Current Scopes: none
     Protocols: -DefaultRoute +LLMNR -mDNS -DNSOverTLS DNSSEC=no/unsupported
   DNS Servers: 192.168.100.1
    DNS Domain: ~resdigita.lan

Link 9 (virbr1)
Current Scopes: none
     Protocols: -DefaultRoute +LLMNR -mDNS -DNSOverTLS DNSSEC=no/unsupported
   DNS Servers: 192.168.100.1
    DNS Domain: ~libreccm.lan
> - - - - - - - - - - - <



> - - - - - - - - - - - <
[ ~]# resolvectl query myhost
myhost: 78.46.93.154                             -- link: enp0s31f6
        192.168.122.1                            -- link: virbr0
        78.46.93.154                             -- link: vbr0s31f6
        192.168.100.1                            -- link: virbr1
        2a01:4f8:120:7142::2                     -- link: enp0s31f6
        2a01:4f8:120:7142::2                     -- link: vbr0s31f6
        fe80::921b:eff:fefc:eed2%2               -- link: enp0s31f6
        fe80::a4eb:59ff:fe2e:d%4                 -- link: vbr0s31f6But
> - - - - - - - - - - - <


DNS resolution doesn't work


> - - - - - - - - - - - <
[ ~]# resolvectl query myhost.resdigita.lan
myhost.resdigita.lan: resolve call failed: 'myhost.resdigita.lan' not found
> - - - - - - - - - - - <

But dig works:

> - - - - - - - - - - - <
[ ~]# dig  @192.168.122.1  myhost.resdigita.lan

; <<>> DiG 9.16.30-RH <<>> @192.168.122.1 myhost.resdigita.lan
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 51954
;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;myhost.resdigita.lan.		IN	A

;; ANSWER SECTION:
myhost.resdigita.lan.	0	IN	A	192.168.122.1

;; Query time: 1 msec
;; SERVER: 192.168.122.1#53(192.168.122.1)
;; WHEN: Sat Jul 30 23:13:55 CEST 2022
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 63
> - - - - - - - - - - - <



Any help greatly appreciated.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux