32 bit pam-libs?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



For a few days now, I've been getting update errors because (apparently)
the 32 bit pam isn't yet in the repos even though the 64 bit version
is newer:

 Problem 1: pam-1.5.2-12.fc36.i686 has inferior architecture
  - cannot install both pam-1.5.2-13.fc36.x86_64 and pam-1.5.2-12.fc36.x86_64
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package pam-1.5.2-12.fc36.i686
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package pam-1.5.2-12.fc36.x86_64
 Problem 2: package libpwquality-1.4.4-7.fc36.i686 requires pam(x86-32), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package pam-1.5.2-12.fc36.i686 requires pam-libs(x86-32) = 1.5.2-12.fc36, but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both pam-libs-1.5.2-13.fc36.i686 and pam-libs-1.5.2-12.fc36.i686
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package pam-libs-1.5.2-12.fc36.i686
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package libpwquality-1.4.4-7.fc36.i686
 Problem 3: problem with installed package pam-1.5.2-12.fc36.i686
  - package pam-1.5.2-12.fc36.i686 requires pam-libs(x86-32) = 1.5.2-12.fc36, but none of the providers can be installed
  - pam-libs-1.5.2-12.fc36.i686 has inferior architecture
  - cannot install both pam-libs-1.5.2-13.fc36.x86_64 and pam-libs-1.5.2-12.fc36.x86_64
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package pam-libs-1.5.2-12.fc36.x86_64

In the past these sorts of things have gone away if I waited a couple
of days, but it has been doing this all week. Is a proper 32 bit pam
going to land soon?

I'm not sure why I currently have 32 bit pam installed, any drastic
consequences for removing all the 32 bit pam packages? There certainly
doesn't appear to be a vast number of packages dnf wants to remove
if I say erase pam.i686 and pam-libs.i686.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux