On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 8:52 AM <jim.cromie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > so a couple of weeks ago, > I did a dnf update, and got ~ 19% reduction due to DRPM > > that was by far the highest return on the effort Id seen. > previous experience for me was 1-4%. > I should have grabbed a "screenshot" and sent it here. > > Whats the "average" experience here ? > are there statistics ? > do *noarch 's do better ? > > how often do you see some version of "find/download failed" ? > (it sometimes appears to be a cached-version problem, > particularly if the update is older than a few days) One more data-point: I got 36% saved this morning. 7/10 packages were drpm'd that seems worth having, esp for the servers. Last metadata expiration check: 0:09:04 ago on Mon 11 Apr 2022 08:27:41 AM MDT. Dependencies resolved. ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Upgrading: selinux-policy noarch 35.16-1.fc35 updates 68 k selinux-policy-targeted noarch 35.16-1.fc35 updates 6.3 M systemd x86_64 249.11-1.fc35 updates 4.1 M systemd-container x86_64 249.11-1.fc35 updates 523 k systemd-libs x86_64 249.11-1.fc35 updates 603 k systemd-networkd x86_64 249.11-1.fc35 updates 523 k systemd-oomd-defaults noarch 249.11-1.fc35 updates 24 k systemd-pam x86_64 249.11-1.fc35 updates 323 k systemd-resolved x86_64 249.11-1.fc35 updates 266 k systemd-udev x86_64 249.11-1.fc35 updates 1.8 M Transaction Summary ================================================================================ Upgrade 10 Packages Total download size: 14 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: (1/10): systemd-libs-249.9-1.fc35_249.11-1.fc35 93 kB/s | 104 kB 00:01 (2/10): systemd-container-249.9-1.fc35_249.11-1 194 kB/s | 262 kB 00:01 (3/10): systemd-pam-249.9-1.fc35_249.11-1.fc35. 272 kB/s | 83 kB 00:00 [DRPM 1/7] systemd-libs-249.9-1.fc35_249.11-1.fc35.x86_64.drpm: done [DRPM 2/7] systemd-container-249.9-1.fc35_249.11-1.fc35.x86_64.drpm: done (4/10): systemd-networkd-249.9-1.fc35_249.11-1. 246 kB/s | 151 kB 00:00 (5/10): systemd-resolved-249.9-1.fc35_249.11-1. 351 kB/s | 87 kB 00:00 [DRPM 3/7] systemd-pam-249.9-1.fc35_249.11-1.fc35.x86_64.drpm: done (6/10): selinux-policy-35.16-1.fc35.noarch.rpm 357 kB/s | 68 kB 00:00 (7/10): systemd-udev-249.9-1.fc35_249.11-1.fc35 375 kB/s | 477 kB 00:01 [DRPM 4/7] systemd-networkd-249.9-1.fc35_249.11-1.fc35.x86_64.drpm: done [DRPM 5/7] systemd-resolved-249.9-1.fc35_249.11-1.fc35.x86_64.drpm: done (8/10): systemd-oomd-defaults-249.11-1.fc35.noa 351 kB/s | 24 kB 00:00 (9/10): systemd-249.9-1.fc35_249.11-1.fc35.x86_ 379 kB/s | 1.7 MB 00:04 (10/10): selinux-policy-targeted-35.16-1.fc35.n 996 kB/s | 6.3 MB 00:06 [DRPM 6/7] systemd-udev-249.9-1.fc35_249.11-1.fc35.x86_64.drpm: done [DRPM 7/7] systemd-249.9-1.fc35_249.11-1.fc35.x86_64.drpm: done -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 1.0 MB/s | 9.2 MB 00:09 Delta RPMs reduced 14.4 MB of updates to 9.2 MB (36.0% saved) _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
