Re: network mystery!!??

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/26/22 23:35, Jack Craig wrote:


On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 11:14 PM Samuel Sieb <samuel@xxxxxxxx <mailto:samuel@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    On 3/26/22 22:57, Jack Craig wrote:
     > (internet)--<att modem|bgw210700>-----lan connect---<netgear
     > nighthawk>--lan connect-----[netgear switch]------<srvr>

    Now we're getting somewhere.  Can you also assign the following IP
    addresses from your original email into that diagram?

    10.0.0.101 ws.linuxlighthouse.com <http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com>
    (internal IP) 2 packets
    transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1033ms
    10.0.0.1                           Blackhole-NH
    2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1018ms
    192.168.1.254                 Blackhole-ATT                        2
    packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1001ms
    108.90.204.76             att subnet (local router)            2
    packets
    transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1002ms
    108.90.204.1            att subnet (remote GW)               2 packets
    transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1001ms
    108.220.213.121 ws.linuxlighthouse.com
    <http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com> (public IP) 2 packets
    transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1001ms
    108.220.213.126   linuxlighthouse (public GW)          2 packets
    transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1001ms

    You wrote:

      > i have a static ip from att in the range
    108.220.213.0/255.255.255.248
    <http://108.220.213.0/255.255.255.248>, 108.220.213.121 is the
    external ip for
    the server.

    But you list two IP addresses from that subnet.  Did they actually give
    you two addresses?  I can ping the .126 one, but not the .121 one.


.121 was supposed to be exported ip, the 126 they said was gateway...

block of 8, 5 usable...

Ok, they give you a small subnet. If .126 is the gateway, then is that your cable modem or the upstream gateway or do you have some computer on that address?

    1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
    group default qlen 1000
         link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
         inet 127.0.0.1/8 <http://127.0.0.1/8> scope host lo
            valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
         inet6 ::1/128 scope host
            valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    *2: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel
    state UP group default qlen 1000
         link/ether 50:65:f3:4a:ec:e5 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
         altname enp0s31f6
         inet 10.0.0.101/24 <http://10.0.0.101/24> brd 10.0.0.255 scope
    global noprefixroute eno1
            valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
         inet6 fe80::2f5c:874d:5113:3d37/64 scope link noprefixroute
            valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever*
    3: virbr0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc
    noqueue state DOWN group default qlen 1000
         link/ether 52:54:00:06:e4:2a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
         inet 192.168.122.1/24 <http://192.168.122.1/24> brd
    192.168.122.255 scope global virbr0
            valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

This doesn't help at all. You still haven't created a useful diagram with IP addresses, so I have no idea how your network is configured. You appear to have several different network ranges hooked up somehow.

Is it really just me? I see various people responding. Do you actually understand what his setup is? It doesn't make any sense at all to me.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux