On 2/10/22 08:35, Thomas Cameron wrote:
RAID0 is great for increasing throughput, but it is the most risky RAID configuration possible. I would never run /home on RAID0 unless I was doing something like two drives in RAID0 but doing nightly backups to a third drive in case my RAID0 volume broke. You're flirting with disaster running /home on RAID0.
As we often say, RAID isn't backup. Or in other words, RAID6 is (essentially) no safer than RAID0 if you don't have backups. I would never run /home on any storage configuration without regular backups, either. From that perspective, it seems odd to warn someone about RAID0. Non-redundant arrays increase the risk of down time, but recovery from data loss is an orthogonal concern.
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
