On Thu, 2022-02-10 at 18:11 +0200, Matti Pulkkinen wrote: > Hello, > > TL;DR are there particular workloads that suffer from having to > access > a RAID0 array? > > I've currently got my /home partition in a BTRFS RAID0 array with two > 1 > TB mechanical drives, and I'm considering getting SSDs for /home > instead. I could get one 2 TB SSD and be happy with it, but I could > instead get two 1 TB SSDs and make a RAID0 array again. The latter > option would of course get me better overall throughput, but I'm > wondering whether there are workloads that might suffer from being > run from a RAID0 array vs. just running on a "bare" disk. What I did was convert my 2x1TB HDDs (rescued from a dead NAS) to a BTRFS RAID1 array and attach them via a USB3 port for use as backup (using BorgBackup, which dedupes and compresses). I installed a single 2TB SSD (on a SATA3 port) for active use, i.e. /root, /home, /boot etc., also under BTRFS but with no RAID. My workload is nothing special, so YMMV, but I find the throughput of the SSD so dramatically better than an HDD that I don't care that it's not striped. poc _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
