Re: NAS purchase advice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,


On Thu, 02 Dec 2021 22:02:39 +1030 Tim via users <users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, 2021-12-02 at 10:46 +0100, Walter Cazzola wrote:
> >    - Linux compliant ie.,
> >        - it should be formatted in ext3/4 or other *nix file system
> > to maintain all the linux file details such as access rights,
> > attributes, links, name lengths/characters, ...  
> 
> I used to use WD MyBook and MyCloud NAS devices, and while it offered
> NFS access, it's normal way for you to use it was for everything to get
> dumped into in an all-user location, owned by root on the disk drive,
> with access restrictions (mis)handled through the networking file
> system.  It seemed the same hairbrained scheme for SMB.
> 
> If you SSHd in and set up your own directories, it could work like NFS
> normally did on Linux.  Mind you, after any reboot or power outage, I'd
> have to SSH in and chown my parent directory back to me from root.
> 
> I'd disabled most of their shovelware, to make thing less painful.  But
> my last delve into removing the crud managed to brick it.
> 
> So... I'd avoid those kind of devices.
> 
> If you have a network of PCs, it might be easiest to dedicate one of
> them as your fileserver, and roll-your-own.  Keep a separate drive for
> the OS from all your data, that makes upgrading the OS easier and safer
> (just unplug your data drive beforehand).  This is what I've done for a
> several years (a Linux server).

Before I switched to a QNAP-based hardware solution (see my former
reply to this thread), I was using a dedicated minimum-config file
server running Linux, a Zotac mini-PC (small, cheap and no noise) with
an external RAID disk enclosure. I must admit that it's barely the same
amount of configuration and setup, at the end, and the pros of
NAS-based solution come with their cons anyway.


Regards,

-- 
wwp
https://useplaintext.email/

Attachment: pgp4KbXueXZIL.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux