> Am 16.11.2021 um 22:02 schrieb Robert Moskowitz <rgm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > On 11/16/21 15:01, Samuel Sieb wrote: >> On 11/16/21 10:18, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>> F35 change from F32; may have occurred earlier. >>> >>> VI was sooo easy to use. >>> >>> Now I have to learn nano? >> >> I was using a debian or Ubuntu system and I ran "visudo". It took me a few moments to figure out why I couldn't get out of it. I laughed at the irony of using nano for *vi*sudo. But this is a good reminder to run "dnf install vim-default-editor --allowerasing" on my newly installed Fedora systems to avoid the same surprise there. > > What is the difference between rpms: > > vim-default-editor > and > default-editor Zdenek Dohnal explained on server list: > The current solution depends on weak dependency system in DNF - default-editor requires system-default-editor which both - vim-default-editor and nano-default-editor - provides (*-default-editors conflicts with system-default-editor as well to prevent both being installed at the same time). > Then if weak-deps are enabled - DNF sees 'Recommends:' in default-editor and brings in nano-default-editor if there isn't any other *-default-editor already installed. If there is, the transaction is not done, but it doesn't fail the whole transaction -> upgrade-path is okay. _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
