That network looks fine to me I would try v3. I have had bad luck many times with v4 on a variety of different kernels. If the code is recovering from something related to a bug 45 seconds might be right to decide something that was working is no longer working. I am not sure any amount of debugging would help (without having really verbose kernel debugging). What is the current kernel you are running and trying a new one might be worth it. Though I don't see nfs changes/fixes listed in the 5.14.* or 5.13.* kernels changelog in the rpm file (rpm -q --changelog) and there are only a few listed at kernel.org for those kernels. On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 11:04 AM Terry Barnaby <terry1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > sar -n EDEV reports all 0's all around then. There are some rxdrop/s of 0.02 occasionally on eno1 through the day (about 20 of these with minute based sampling). > Today ifconfig lists 39 dropped RX packets out of 2357593. Not sure why there are some dropped packets. "ethtool -S eno1" doesn't seem to list any particular issues. > > sar -n DEV does not appear to show anything at 10:51:30: > > IFACE rxpck/s txpck/s rxkB/s txkB/s rxcmp/s txcmp/s rxmcst/s %ifutil > 10:44:04 eno1 18.29 19.54 5.81 5.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 > 10:45:04 lo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 > 10:45:04 eno1 20.45 22.52 5.96 5.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 > 10:46:04 lo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 > 10:46:04 eno1 22.50 24.26 7.52 7.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 > 10:47:04 lo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 > 10:47:04 eno1 21.53 22.75 7.27 5.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 > 10:48:04 lo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 > 10:48:04 eno1 222.03 284.24 173.49 367.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 > 10:49:04 lo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 > 10:49:04 eno1 11.83 12.28 2.74 3.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 > 10:50:04 lo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 > 10:50:04 eno1 15.72 14.13 4.33 3.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 > 10:51:04 lo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 > 10:51:04 eno1 11.00 10.53 3.48 2.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 > 10:52:04 lo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 > 10:52:04 eno1 13.48 13.45 4.21 4.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 > 10:53:04 lo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 > 10:53:04 eno1 21.76 23.98 6.99 10.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 > 10:54:04 lo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 > > Also NFV4 uses TCP/IP I think by default and TCP/IP retries would be much quicker than 45 seconds. > I do feel there is an issue in the NFS code somewhere, but I am biased about the speed of NFS directory access these days ! > > On 04/10/2021 17:06, Roger Heflin wrote: > > Since it is recovering from it, maybe it is losing packets inside the > network, what does "sar -n DEV" and "sar -n EDEV" look like during > that time on both client seeing the pause and the server. > > EDEV is typically all zeros unless something is lost. if something is > being lost and it matches the times the time of hangs that could be > it. > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
