Re: problem to updating to fedora 34 <invalid crypto engine>

[Angelo Moreschini <mrangelo.fedora@xxxxxxxxx>]

ok....

I get this :

Skypeforlinux - stable                          4.0 kB/s | 2.9 kB     00:00    
Dependencies resolved.
================================================================================
 Package                           Arch   Version                Repo      Size
================================================================================
Installing:
 kernel                            x86_64 5.11.22-100.fc32       updates  153 k

FOLLOW A  LIST OF PACKAGES...

AND AFTER :

zchunk-libs                       x86_64 1.1.9-1.fc32           updates   47 k
Installing dependencies:
 criu-libs                         x86_64 3.15-1.fc32            updates   31 k
 jetty-util-ajax                   noarch 9.4.40-1.fc32          updates   60 k
 libadwaita-qt5                    x86_64 1.2.0-1.fc32           updates  116 k
 libjaylink                        x86_64 0.2.0-1.fc32           updates   39 k
 libudfread                        x86_64 1.1.2-1.fc32           updates   34 k
 python3-aeidon                    noarch 1.4.1-2.fc32           updates  180 k
     replacing  aeidon.noarch 1.4-8.fc32
Installing weak dependencies:
 fwupd-plugin-uefi-capsule-data    x86_64 1.5.7-1.fc32           updates  1.1 M
 sudo-python-plugin                x86_64 1.9.5p2-1.fc32         updates   56 k
Removing:
 kernel                            x86_64 5.6.19-200.fc31        @updates   0  
 kernel-core                       x86_64 5.6.19-200.fc31        @updates  72 M
 kernel-modules                    x86_64 5.6.19-200.fc31        @updates  28 M
 kernel-modules-extra              x86_64 5.6.19-200.fc31        @updates 1.9 M
Removing dependent packages:
 python2-pip                       noarch 19.1.1-8.fc31          @updates 8.6 M

Transaction Summary
================================================================================
Install   12 Packages
Upgrade  413 Packages
Remove     5 Packages

Total size: 974 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y

i ANSWER YES

AND COME :

Downloading Packages:
[SKIPPED] criu-libs-3.15-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm: Already downloaded                
[SKIPPED] fwupd-plugin-uefi-capsule-data-1.5.7-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm: Already downloaded
[SKIPPED] jetty-util-ajax-9.4.40-1.fc32.noarch.rpm: Already downloaded        
[SKIPPED] kernel-5.11.22-100.fc32.x86_64.rpm: Already downloaded

..................

...................

.................

[SKIPPED] zchunk-libs-1.1.9-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm: Already downloaded              
warning: /var/cache/dnf/updates-b3cb4614b6495970/packages/criu-libs-3.15-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm: Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 12c944d0: NOKEY
Fedora 32 - x86_64 - Updates                     70 kB/s | 1.6 kB     00:00    
The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful transaction.
You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'.
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/dnf", line 58, in <module>
    main.user_main(sys.argv[1:], exit_code=True)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 201, in user_main
    errcode = main(args)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 67, in main
    return _main(base, args, cli_class, option_parser_class)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 106, in _main
    return cli_run(cli, base)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 130, in cli_run
    ret = resolving(cli, base)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 176, in resolving
    base.do_transaction(display=displays)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dnf/cli/cli.py", line 236, in do_transaction
    self.gpgsigcheck(install_pkgs)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dnf/cli/cli.py", line 288, in gpgsigcheck
    self._get_key_for_package(po, fn)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dnf/base.py", line 2335, in _get_key_for_package
    keys = dnf.crypto.retrieve(keyurl, repo)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dnf/crypto.py", line 177, in retrieve
    keyinfos = rawkey2infos(handle)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dnf/crypto.py", line 158, in rawkey2infos
    with pubring_dir(pb_dir), Context() as ctx:
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.8/site-packages/gpg/core.py", line 220, in __init__
    self.protocol = protocol
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.8/site-packages/gpg/core.py", line 169, in __setattr__
    super(GpgmeWrapper, self).__setattr__(key, value)
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.8/site-packages/gpg/core.py", line 1123, in protocol
    errorcheck(gpgme.gpgme_engine_check_version(value))
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.8/site-packages/gpg/errors.py", line 129, in errorcheck
    raise GPGMEError(retval, extradata)
gpg.errors.GPGMEError: GPGME: Invalid crypto engine
[angelo_dev@localhost ~]$

this is all

On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 2:13 PM Ed Greshko <ed.greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 04/10/2021 19:07, Angelo Moreschini wrote:
> thank you  for answering me Ed,
>
>
> I get this message (<*gpg.errors.GPGMEError: GPGME: Invalid crypto engine*>) after the
> command  <*sudo dnf upgrade --refresh*>
>
> in my opinion this is a problem connected to PGP ...
> (...something about the keys usage---)
>
> I know this tip, but not enough to do any serious control of the bug..
>
> Thank you for your help

Well, I was asking for a bit more than just the error message.

Normal output looking something like this....


[egreshko@f35m ~]$ sudo dnf upgrade --refresh
[sudo] password for egreshko:
Fedora 35 - x86_64                                5.3 kB/s | 4.4 kB     00:00
Fedora 35 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64          2.3 kB/s | 990  B     00:00
Fedora Modular 35 - x86_64                         25 kB/s | 6.0 kB     00:00
Fedora 35 - x86_64 - Updates                       15 kB/s | 6.5 kB     00:00
Fedora Modular 35 - x86_64 - Updates               21 kB/s | 6.4 kB     00:00
Fedora 35 - x86_64 - Test Updates                  14 kB/s | 4.2 kB     00:00
Fedora Modular 35 - x86_64 - Test Updates          15 kB/s | 5.7 kB     00:00
Dependencies resolved.
Nothing to do.
Complete!

So, in your case, are some, none, of the repos being queried?

And, or, have you tried "sudo dnf clean all" and then the upgrade?

--
Nothing to see here
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure