Ed Greshko writes:
On 20/09/2021 00:08, Sam Varshavchik wrote:Is anyone else getting this error in the "Security processor troubleshooting" (21H1, with all updates installed)?It has been nearly 2 months since I worked on this. But, yes, that is what I was seeing. No matter what I did I could not get passed that issue. I gave up and moved on to installing Win11.
I think I figured it out. That message has nothing to do with the TPM chip per se, real or emulated. In "Security Processor" there was a similar, vague message, but with a "more information" link. That goes to a web page, which is full of Microsoftese. Rather than describing what it wants in clear technical terms, it meanders on topics like "basic security requirements", "enhanced security requirements", and similar handwaving. I reread that five times, then I figured out that it wants UEFI+Secure Boot, to make this warning message go away.
All the Win11 press was about the TPM 2.0 requirement, there was no mention of a UEFI+Secure Boot requirement for upgrading, but I wouldn't want to draw any conclusions.
Attachment:
pgpRlLCTaqsUW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
