Re: NFS mount

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



grep -i nfs /boot/config-<kernelversion>   should tell you what is
configured in the kernel.

Fedora 33 shows this on recent kernels:

 grep -i nfs /boot/config-5.11.22-100.fc32.x86_64  | grep -i v2
# CONFIG_NFS_V2 is not set
CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL=y

So disabled in the kernel seems likely for 34 also.

You would have to rebuild a kernel with that set to =m and boot that
for v2 to work.


On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 5:46 PM Dave Close <dave@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Historical background below.
>
> I have now confirmed that the NAS device NFS server is working properly.
> I am able to mount it from a Raspberry Pi running kernel 5.4.72-v7+ #1356
> and nfs-common/oldstable,now 1:1.3.4-2.5+deb10u1. I still cannot mount
> it from Fedora 34 running nfs-utils-2.5.4-0. The error remains as shown
> below, "mount(2): Protocol not supported". Even though I have explicitly
> asked for mount v2, it appears that Fedora's mount doesn't work with v2.
>
> Thanks to those who replied earlier. However, your ideas didn't help.
>
> I wrote:
>
> >I'm trying to setup an NFS mount to an older NAS device.  The client
> >is Fedora 34, the NAS is a Buffalo Linkstation. I have access to the
> >NAS via SSH and I can successfully mount it using CIFS and SSHFS. Of
> >course, CIFS loses some file attributes and SSHFS seems slow and
> >doesn't see the filesystem usage properly. So I'd prefer NFS but it
> >keeps failing. I've even tried with my firewall disabled but no luck.
> >
> >The NAS only works with NFS v2. It's NFS is a client-side application
> >as there is no NFS built into its kernel. But it is nothing new; the
> >app has been running successfully for many folks for years.
> >
> >All the necessary ports seem to be open.
> >
> >  # nmap -sU -p2049,111 nas1
> >  PORT     STATE SERVICE
> >  111/udp  open  rpcbind
> >  2049/udp open  nfs
> >  # nmap -sT -p2049,111 nas1
> >  PORT     STATE SERVICE
> >  111/tcp  open  rpcbind
> >  2049/tcp open  nfs
> >
> >I can access the NAS with rpcinfo and showmount.
> >
> >  # showmount -e nas1
> >  Export list for nas1:
> >  /mnt/array1/share client.compata.com
> >  # rpcinfo -p nas1
> >     program vers proto   port  service
> >      100000    2   tcp    111  portmapper
> >      100000    2   udp    111  portmapper
> >      100003    2   udp   2049  nfs
> >      100003    2   tcp   2049  nfs
> >      100005    1   udp    726  mountd
> >      100005    2   udp    726  mountd
> >      100005    1   tcp    729  mountd
> >      100005    2   tcp    729  mountd
> >
> >But mount fails.
> >
> >  # mount -v -o vers=2 -t nfs nas1:/mnt/array1/share /nas1
> >  mount.nfs: timeout set for Sat Aug 28 17:52:01 2021
> >  mount.nfs: trying text-based options 'vers=2,addr=192.168.44.20'
> >  mount.nfs: prog 100003, trying vers=2, prot=6
> >  mount.nfs: trying 192.168.44.20 prog 100003 vers 2 prot TCP port 2049
> >  mount.nfs: prog 100005, trying vers=1, prot=17
> >  mount.nfs: trying 192.168.44.20 prog 100005 vers 1 prot UDP port 726
> >  mount.nfs: mount(2): Protocol not supported
> >  mount.nfs: Protocol not supported
> >
> >  # mount -v -o udp -o vers=2 -t nfs nas1:/mnt/array1/share /nas1
> >  mount.nfs: timeout set for Sat Aug 28 17:53:43 2021
> >  mount.nfs: trying text-based options 'udp,vers=2,addr=192.168.44.20'
> >  mount.nfs: prog 100003, trying vers=2, prot=17
> >  mount.nfs: trying 192.168.44.20 prog 100003 vers 2 prot UDP port 2049
> >  mount.nfs: prog 100005, trying vers=1, prot=17
> >  mount.nfs: trying 192.168.44.20 prog 100005 vers 1 prot UDP port 726
> >  mount.nfs: mount(2): Protocol not supported
> >  mount.nfs: Protocol not supported
> >
> >I have tcpdump captures from both ends and I don't see anything obviously
> >wrong. (But then I'm not sure just what I ought to see there.) I do see
> >the portmap calls and the results seem ok. Each is followed by a null
> >call and a null reply, again nothing obviously wrong. I don't understand
> >why the mount proceeds to use V1 for prog 100005 (mount) without any
> >indication of a problem with the V2 attempt for NFS. But forcing V2 for
> >both doesn't help.
> >
> >  # mount -v -o nfsvers=2 -o mountvers=2 -o mountproto=tcp -t nfs
> >    nas1:/mnt/array1/share /nas1
> >  mount.nfs: timeout set for Sat Aug 28 18:28:37 2021
> >  mount.nfs: trying text-based options 'nfsvers=2,mountvers=2,
> >    mountproto=tcp,addr=192.168.44.20,mountaddr=192.168.44.20'
> >  mount.nfs: prog 100003, trying vers=2, prot=6
> >  mount.nfs: trying 192.168.44.20 prog 100003 vers 2 prot TCP port 2049
> >  mount.nfs: prog 100005, trying vers=2, prot=6
> >  mount.nfs: trying 192.168.44.20 prog 100005 vers 2 prot TCP port 729
> >  mount.nfs: mount(2): Protocol not supported
> >  mount.nfs: Protocol not supported
> >
> >I can't find anything relevant in any system log. The final message,
> >"Protocol not supported", doesn't clearly indicate which protocol --
> >I presume mount(2) -- nor give any clue to a remedy. But if I force
> >v3 for mount, I get a version mismatch.
> --
>          Dave Close, Compata, Irvine CA       +1 714 434 7359
>        dave@xxxxxxxxxxx              dhclose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> "Paying attention to politicians can make you dumb." - Declan McCullagh
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux