On 7/12/21 2:36 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
There is no need to enable it. I've never enabled it.
You never had to as the rpm post install script takes
care of it for you
To see if yours is enabled, do a
$ ls -al
/etc/systemd/system/spice-vdagentd.target.wants/spice-vdagentd.service
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 46 Nov 5 2017
/etc/systemd/system/spice-vdagentd.target.wants/spice-vdagentd.service
-> /usr/lib/systemd/system/spice-vdagentd.service
This is the same on everyone of my Fedora machines,
except KDE. And it means the link was created when
it was enabled by systemctl.
> And, you've not shown any evidence of crashing you've only
> stated it.
Uhhh. I copied the error message from systemctl. In case
you missed it:
# systemctl enable spice-vdagentd
The unit files have no installation config (WantedBy=, RequiredBy=, Also=,
Alias= settings in the [Install] section, and DefaultInstance= for template
units). This means they are not meant to be enabled using systemctl.
Possible reasons for having this kind of units are:
• A unit may be statically enabled by being symlinked from another unit's
.wants/ or .requires/ directory.
• A unit's purpose may be to act as a helper for some other unit which has
a requirement dependency on it.
• A unit may be started when needed via activation (socket, path, timer,
D-Bus, udev, scripted systemctl call, ...).
• In case of template units, the unit is meant to be enabled with some
instance name specified.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure