Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 01/05/2021 06:36, Feoli, Dr. Enrique via users wrote:
>> This the result:
>> [efeoli@localhost ~]$ rpm -q openjfix openjfx8
There is a typo in the command, it's openjfx, not openjfix.
An "i" snuck into the example command.
>> package openjfix is not installed
>> openjfx8-8.0.202-26.b07.fc34.x86_64
The ".fc34" in the above should indicate that you're running
Fedora 34. If you're not, then you're running some hybrid
of 33 and 34, at the least. :)
> sudo dnf erase openjfx8
Or perhaps:
sudo dnf erase 'openjfx*'
to ensure any of the openjfx subpackages are removed?
Though I'm not sure this matters if the upgrade actually
completed. Then the issue is simply that the two versions
of openjfx cannot be installed in parallel at the moment,
due to the file conflict.
--
Todd
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
