On 2021-04-27 5:34 p.m., Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
On 28/04/2021 03.22, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2021-04-27 7:14 a.m., Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
Today I noticed that I am running an old version of gthumb, built
from src. So I removed the whole package
and then installed the standard one:
Installed Packages
gthumb.x86_64 1:3.10.1-1.fc32 @updates
(gthumb:818392): GLib-GIO-ERROR **: 22:58:54.035: Settings schema
'org.gnome.gthumb.browser' does not contain a key named
'sidebar-sections'
Trace/breakpoint trap (core dumped)
What does "grep -rn sidebar-sections /usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas" give
you?
And "ls -l /usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas/gschemas.compiled"?
If "gschemas.compiled" isn't in the list from the first command, then
try deleting it and run gthumb again.
$ grep -rn sidebar-sections /usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas
/usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas/org.gnome.gthumb.gschema.xml:110: <key
name="sidebar-sections" type="as">
Binary file /usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas/gschemas.compiled matches
So it's there. Something else must be conflicting.
$ ls -l /usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas/gschemas.compiled
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 256276 Apr 27 09:27
/usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas/gschemas.compiled
BTW: removing gschemas.compiled and running gthumb failes with
GLib-GIO-ERROR **: 08:38:44.163: Settings schema
'org.gnome.desktop.background' is not installed
Trace/breakpoint trap (core dumped)
Rebuilding with
$ sudo /usr/bin/glib-compile-schemas /usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas/
creates an identical file.
Commenting out the <key ...> section in org.gnome.gthumb.gschema.xml
makes no difference.
<key name="sidebar-sections" type="as">
<default>[]</default>
</key>
You definitely don't want to comment it out.
Another line of investigation:
stracing the failure I see it looking for icons in
/usr/local/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/gthumb.png
which does not exist. I removed it when I removed my build from src.
On my other, working, system it looks in
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/org.gnome.gThumb.png
Try running "gtk-update-icon-cache".
I now think that some config file that was set during the build from src
is still active?
It's possible. If you did a direct install instead of creating an rpm
from source, then it's probably somewhere under /usr/local.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
