Re: NOKEY warning from yum update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 26/04/2021 03:34, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021, Ed Greshko wrote:



Well, for sure you have rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data installed on your system. And,
in the update process it is found that the signing key needs and update as well.

As a guess, I tried yum update --exclude '*fusion*'
It ran and did updates.
Following that with a yum update
gave me a nothing to do.

Of course.  You would have gotten the same "nothing to do" if you had run
dnf --disablerepo rpmfusion-nonfree-updates update


You can see what rpmfusion packages are installed by doing

dnf list installed | grep rpmfusion

root@localhost entries]# dnf list installed | grep nonfree
rpmfusion-nonfree-release.noarch 33-1                                @@commandline [root@localhost entries]#

Well I don't know how/if the output would have been different if dnf had been used to install.  But I
would have expected something like.

rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.noarch 34-1.fc34                            @rpmfusion-nonfree

Indicating that the install was via the repo.  What I see above suggests it was installed after downloading
an rpm.

LIke this one I had done after download a utility....

usbcaptureutility.x86_64 3.0.3.4202-1.el7.centos                @@commandline

But, I had installed the rpm using dnf.  So, it does show up as a transaction.

  1069 | install ./usbcaptureutility | 2019-12-13 15:13 | Install        |    1


And you can find out when rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data was installed by using

dnf history rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data

[root@localhost entries]# dnf history rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data
No transaction which manipulates package 'rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data' was found.
[root@localhost entries]#

Wow.

This suggests to me that maybe "rpm" was used directly to install.


And when you find the transaction number you can do

dnf history info X

where X is the transaction number.

The "yum" command has been depreciated for some time now.  dnf the preferred command
to use for command line updates.

I don't know why you'd see this request to update the key as a "problem".

I took it as a request to continue without a valid key.

No...  It did say "Importing GPG key..."  And you are being asked if that is OK.

You could always try....

dnf erase rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data

and see if a package needs it.

--
Remind me to ignore comments which aren't germane to the thread.

_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux