> 2021-04-11 6:38 UTC+02:00, home user <mattisonw(a)comcast.net>: > > [...] > > > This isn't necessarily a good idea, because those dangling symlinks > may belong to their respective packages. If so, removing them will > compromise the integrity of the package they belong to. I don't fully understand. Of what use is a link to nowhere? I did what the instructions said. What you say implies that the upgrade instructions need to be revised. The instructions are here: "https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/dnf-system-upgrade/";. >From past experience, I can say the Fedora doc. team wants more than a bug; they want suggested wording. What should the instructions say? If preferred, this can be split off into a separate thread, and I can close this thread. _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
