Re: BTRFS settings for media storage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 4:31 PM George N. White III <gnwiii@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Your plan needs to consider backups and/or replication (to cloud or another site).    It is easy and cheap to lose data.  Not losing data is not easy and not cheap.

Exactly this. If the data is important, it's backed up. If it's not
backed up, in some sence both fair and unfair, the data isn't
important to you.

And I mean, it's an unfair penalty to find out the importance of
backups via data loss. It's a disproportionate penalty.

Raid1 is not a backup. If you accidentally delete a file, for sure
raid1 will ensure both mirrors record the accident.

Snapshots aren't a backup, because they aren't fully independent from
either the file system or hardware. (They can make it easier to do a
'btrfs restore' in some cases - but I don't want folks thinking they
can depend on restore, it's seriously a PITA. Very capable, but
tedious and requires patience.)

In aggregate, with large volume users with consumer hardware, we
aren't seeing Btrfs fall over more often than other file systems.
It's true that it's harder to fix if it gets broken. It's also true
you have multiple chances of recovery if it gets broken but all of
them are less convenient than having a backup.

Nevertheless, if it breaks, we still want bug reports because, to the
degree that it is possible, we don't want it breaking.

Btrfs is quite noisy (in dmesg) when there are problems. It's not
subtle about it, by design. Corruption of any kind is not normal, the
source should be found. Persistent stats are also retained in the file
system metadata, retrievable by:

btrfs device stats /mntpoint or /dev/ node(s)


-- 
Chris Murphy
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux