On 1/9/21 9:09 AM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
I mean, this is the reason I keep complaining that BTRFS is not stable enough.
...
So is this a problem of my machine/firmware or a problem in BTRFS itself ?
Since I haven't seen it asked yet: Does this system have ECC RAM?
I don't want to shortcut the debugging process or suggest that I think
there are no bugs in btrfs, but one of the things we expected to happen
in the move to checksummed filesystems is that bits that flipped in
memory and then got written to disk were going to be discovered, where
older filesystems had no way to discover that. In those cases, bailing
out and informing you that corruption was found isn't a sign that the
system is "not stable enough", it's the desired outcome of actually
checking the results.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
