Re: automount requests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 31Dec2020 11:08, Greg Woods <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 11:04 PM Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 10:12 AM Greg Woods <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
>> wrote:
>> > pub.automount: Got automount request for /pub, triggered by 242640
>> (PT3122): 1 Time(s)
>> >
>> > I want to determine why this is happening, because the drive containing
>> /pub (on a different machine mounted via NFS)  is spun down when idle, and
>> these events are likely causing it to spin up. My understanding is that the
>> part inside the parentheses is the command name of the process that
>> triggered it, but I don't know what the "PT" syntax means.
>> >
>>
>> One of those should be PID.
>>
>
>Yes. The format is  "Got automount request for /pub, triggered by #PID#
>(#command#): 1 Time(s)
[...]
>The problem here is that, by the time I see one of these entries and
>investigate, the PID is for a process that is long gone, and I'm not
>getting any useful info about what command is triggering this.

Had you considered something like this (untested, and needs work):

    tail -F /var/log/messages \
    | while read -r line
      do
        case "$line" in
          *'Got automount request for /pub, triggered by '*)
            ... extract the PID from $Line, do a "ps axf" and locate the 
            process and its ancestors, write to log ...
            ;;
        esac
      done

There's a few things to note here:

- might be the wrong log filename
- "tail -f" and "tail -F" (reopen the file if it gets replaced, eg by 
  logrotate) have unbuffered output, getting timely response
- I'm using the shell to read line by line, again to act immediately
- filtering the "tail" with awk or something would buffer the awk 
  output, meaning response gets delayed (likely until after PID is gone)

Also, regarding your /pub automount: if you make the export from the 
server cross mounts (use the "crossmnt" option in /etc/exports) then you 
could make /pub itself be a small directory on some always spun up disc 
on the server eg / but put the _contents_ lower down mounted from other 
spun down discs.  If you use bind mounts into /pub on the server you 
don't need to rearrange the source data.

Doing that may isolate the spun down drives from /pub itself, thus 
deferring spin up until something genuinely tried to access the data in 
the spin down subdirectories.

Cheers,
Cameron Simpson <cs@xxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux