On Thu, 2020-12-24 at 13:07 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 11:29:02AM -0600, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via users wrote:what alternative VNC can folks recommend in its place? I seriously needone to support development of virtual machines hosted on a server withhuge storage, and the local console of that storage machine is not in asuitable place for development.Does X2Go work for your use cases?Or, wait, since you're running VMs, have you considered using VNC as thegraphics console for your VMs and connecting directly?--Matthew MillerFedora Project Leader
Matt,
The primary mission of the server is mass storage (19 TB ZFS). Direct console (MATE) and ssh connections meet those needs just fine. It's the new mission objective of using that huge back-end storage space for creating virtual machines to prototype new client servers (not yet purchased). A VNC supporting the MATE desktop would be ideal since the local console is located in an inconvenient space. My plans to use TigerVNC to access virtual machines on this server now seem to be torpedoed.
--Doc Savage
Fairview Heights, IL
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
