>Is Fedora 32 more stable than 33 or vice versa, as on November, 2020?
While a release is not EOL it tends to stay fairly well synchronized to the latest release. For example, 33 and 32 are running the same basic kernel.
>If a user were to take present state of Rawhide, but not update risky packages, would there be any benefit to that ? Meaning to manually update, skipping some packages.
If your care-about is reliability I would leave Rawhide alone. Selective updating often causes issues as old packages can end up blocking updates that you want eventually.
>Are some Desktop Environments in Fedora more stable ?
That's an emotive question to be sure. I find Xfce the most solid, especially on Rawhide where GNOME 3rd party extensions regularly break during development releases of GNOME (which Rawhide gets).
>What are some packages that are the most risky to update ? systemd ? mesa ? kernel ?
I find release versions tend to be pretty good overall. Your mileage may vary. I would update everything always. Unless you want to fiddle and file bug reports I would stay clear of Rawhide, I'm having plenty of issues with it at the moment.
Ian
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
