Re: system-upgrade f31 to f32 on CLI fails (update)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 19:55:24 -0300 "George N. White III" <gnwiii@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 at 13:57, Ranjan Maitra <maitra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > So,  I have been trying to upgrade this fully updated f31 machine on the
> > CLI. I have tried the following:
> >
> >
> > $ sudo dnf --refresh upgrade
> > Adobe Systems Incorporated                       17 kB/s | 2.9 kB     00:00
> > Fedora 31 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64        6.6 kB/s | 986  B     00:00
> > Fedora Modular 31 - x86_64                       93 kB/s |  16 kB     00:00
> > Fedora Modular 31 - x86_64 - Updates             77 kB/s |  13 kB     00:00
> > Fedora 31 - x86_64 - Updates                     71 kB/s |  12 kB     00:00
> > Fedora 31 - x86_64 - Updates                    801 kB/s | 2.8 MB     00:03
> > Fedora 31 - x86_64                               96 kB/s |  16 kB     00:00
> > google-chrome                                    18 kB/s | 1.3 kB     00:00
> > RPM Fusion for Fedora 31 - Free - Updates        14 kB/s | 3.3 kB     00:00
> > RPM Fusion for Fedora 31 - Free                  23 kB/s | 3.1 kB     00:00
> > RPM Fusion for Fedora 31 - Nonfree - Updates     25 kB/s | 3.4 kB     00:00
> > RPM Fusion for Fedora 31 - Nonfree               23 kB/s | 3.1 kB     00:00
> > Dependencies resolved.
> > Nothing to do.
> > Complete!
> >
> > $ sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=32
> > Before you continue ensure that your system is fully upgraded by running
> > "dnf --refresh upgrade". Do you want to continue [y/N]: y
> > Adobe Systems Incorporated                       17 kB/s | 2.9 kB     00:00
> > Fedora 32 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64        6.7 kB/s | 986  B     00:00
> > Fedora Modular 32 - x86_64                       87 kB/s |  16 kB     00:00
> > Fedora Modular 32 - x86_64 - Updates             71 kB/s |  13 kB     00:00
> > Fedora 32 - x86_64 - Updates                     65 kB/s |  11 kB     00:00
> > Fedora 32 - x86_64 - Updates                    402 kB/s | 460 kB     00:01
> > Fedora 32 - x86_64                               88 kB/s |  16 kB     00:00
> > google-chrome                                    24 kB/s | 1.3 kB     00:00
> > RPM Fusion for Fedora 32 - Free - Updates        24 kB/s | 3.3 kB     00:00
> > RPM Fusion for Fedora 32 - Free                  22 kB/s | 3.1 kB     00:00
> > RPM Fusion for Fedora 32 - Nonfree - Updates     25 kB/s | 3.4 kB     00:00
> > RPM Fusion for Fedora 32 - Nonfree               23 kB/s | 3.1 kB     00:00
> > Error:
> >  Problem: The operation would result in removing the following protected
> > packages: dnf, systemd, systemd-udev
> > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
> >
> > $ sudo dnf distro-sync
> > Last metadata expiration check: 0:14:06 ago on Wed 02 Sep 2020 11:22:53 AM
> > CDT.
> > Error:
> >  Problem: The operation would result in removing the following protected
> > packages: dnf, systemd, systemd-udev
> > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
> >
> > I can not figure out what to do. Any suggestions?
> >
>
> Upgrading a broken system often leads to an open-ended fight with broken
> apps.    If you
> backup anything important and do a fresh install you know you will get a
> working system in
> finite time.
>
> It is amazing how fast two systems that start out with identical hardware
> and software from
> a disk image can diverge, especially when used by students.

I had a good chuckle at this one! But to be fair, this particular student was (is) older than the average and knows quite a lot. Nevertheless,
I decided that it is perhaps best to go ahead and do a fresh install and have done that.

Thanks again to everybody for all your help!

Best wishes,
Ranjan

Ranjan
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux