Re: I need a PDF editor that is Dynamic XFA friendly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020-08-20 18:34, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-08-21 09:03, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-08-20 16:43, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-08-21 07:33, Doug McGarrett wrote:


On 8/20/20 7:15 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-08-21 06:50, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,

I need PDF Editor that is Dynamic XFA friendly.

And example file would be:

https://tax.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/taxnvgov/Content/Forms/Sales_and_Use_Tax_Return_07-01-11(1)1(2).pdf

PDF Studio has no Dynamic XFA support and Master
PDF Editor only has limited support (fields won't
update).

And I don't mind paying for it, IF IT WORKS!
Use google to search "xfa support linux"

Hint: The first suggestion works.  (Well, at least the first one I was presented).

That search comes up with a deb format file. If you add "rpm" to that, you get Master PDF Editor.
Is it possible that there is a version of PDF Editor that is more recent than the google reply?
I haven't tried this lately, so I don't know what editor I used "back when" or if I just downloaded
the form, filled it out in ink and mailed it! (PDF Editor has just come out with an update. Maybe
that works?)


I too am proponent of trying things for oneself.

The download of the tar version of Master PDF editor works fine. The rpm package has an issue.

I am not having issue with Master PDF Editor's RPM and have been using Master PDF for years.

The form I posted, it does not update the totals correctly.

For the short time I played with the form I found no errors updating the totals.

Try sticking things in column F

You should probably report the issue to their support email address.

    "Well, there is basically no way for us to extend support
    because XFA was never openly documented.

    Sincerely,
    Code Industry Ltd



If you are having issue with the RPM, maybe you forgot to add
".sh" at the end of the program name?

/opt/master-pdf-editor-5/masterpdfeditor5.sh

If you leave the .sh off, Qt libraries won't load correctly


A properly packaged application should not require one to fiddle with it to get it to work from the command
line.  Command completion should just work.

They changed the way they did the .desktop file and many
system did not catch the update.


It gets called just fine from the menu or desktop file as those do reference the shell script which does
use the library path variable.  yuck.

It has to do with private Qt libraries
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux