On 11/6/20 4:21 am, Tom H wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 1:40 AM Stephen Morris <samorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/6/20 7:12 am, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 1:55 PM Stephen Morris <samorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I have the following statement in fstab:
192.168.1.12:/mnt/HD/HD_a2 /mnt/nfs nfs
nfsvers=1,x-systemd.automount,defaults 0 0
When I issue the command 'mount /mnt/nfs' it fails with the
following messages shown in dmesg, which indicate that the mount
seems to be trying to proceed via nfs4, why is it doing this when I
have the option nfsvers=1?
[48439.472418] FS-Cache: Netfs 'nfs' registered for caching
[48439.472732] *** VALIDATE nfs ***
[48439.472741] *** VALIDATE nfs4 ***
[48439.476329] Key type dns_resolver registered
[48439.639981] NFS: Registering the id_resolver key type
[48439.639993] Key type id_resolver registered
[48439.639994] Key type id_legacy registered
[48439.844036] NFS4: Couldn't follow remote path
[48439.852856] NFS4: Couldn't follow remote path
[48439.898650] NFS4: Couldn't follow remote path
[48480.763754] NFS4: Couldn't follow remote path
[48480.774645] NFS4: Couldn't follow remote path
nfsv1 has never existed. Use "nfsvers=3" or "nfsvers=4".
In another thread to Roger I've mentioned that in F28, and even
though I didn't specify it, probably F30, Fedora used nfs4 by default
Indeed, nfsv4 has been the default for many releases. So it makes
sense that the mount would fallback to nfsv4 if the requested version
isn't available.
which would not enable mounting of my nas, I had to specify nfsvers=1
in the mount instruction in fstab for the nas to be mounted, which
now seems to no longer work. Following your suggestion I have tried
nfsvers=3 and that has enabled the nas to be mounted.
I'm glad that "nfsvers=3" is working. Are you sure that you're not
misremembering "nfsvers=1"?
It is possible I'm not remembering it correctly. Some time back I had an
issue where when I specified the mount point in fstab and manually
issued the mount the mount would fail (I've forgotten the exact syntax
of the error) and when I raised a query on this list I thought I was
told to try nfsvers=1, but as you have said I could be mis-remembering
it. The other thing that I just found that might be interesting is if I
specify nfsvers=2 I get the message 'protocol not supported'.
regards,
Steve
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
