Re: franz on Fedora?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 18:21:14 +0800 Ed Greshko <ed.greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 2020-04-26 17:43, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Sun, 2020-04-26 at 18:41 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
> >> On Sun, 2020-04-26 at 13:37 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> >>> It is a way that some people/projects distribute their software.
> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AppImage
> >> I hope we don't get lumbered with a lot of them.  One of the best
> >> things about Fedora (and similar Linuxes) was the one-stop way of
> >> keeping everything up-to-date (yum update, dnf update, commands, and
> >> their GUI tools, etc).
> >>
> >> Going down the Windows route of having to individually update each
> >> application from disparate sources, or each application doing their own
> >> check for updates (usually when you start them up, and just want to use
> >> them without wasting any time), is something I do not want to go back
> >> to.
> >>
> >> And I'm sure we'd also see applications that don't quite work right on
> >> our systems, because it tried to be too universal.
> > Agreed. An appimage might be useful as a way to test-drive something,
> > but I wouldn't want to be tied to it.
> 
> Well, I think the main target for these images may be people who use linux but don't manage
> the system.  Not much different from the way some folks download the tar file of firefox and run
> it from their own area.
> 
> In the case of the OP's question, there doesn't seem to be an rpm available for Fedora.  So, unless
> one can be found this would be an alternative.

So, I have found that so-called flatpak has this software for fedora.

https://flathub.org/apps/details/com.meetfranz.Franz

What are flatpaks and why are they better or worse than rpm. Separately, there is someone who tried to create a spec file:
https://github.com/meetfranz/franz/issues/647#issuecomment-438224187

But the spec file uses yarn. I had no idea as to what that was so I looked into the repos and came up with yarnpkg which would install 138M worth of stuff. Are there alternatives?

I will try the rpm route unless the flatpak offers a better approach.

Many thanks,
Ranjan
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux