On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 10:40, Frederic Muller <fred@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 4/5/20 8:14 PM, Francis.Montagnac@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sun, 05 Apr 2020 08:53:46 -0300 "George N. White III" wrote:
>> On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 06:59, Frederic Muller <fred@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> sudo dnf install openvas-gsa
>>> Error:
>>> Problem: conflicting requests
>>> - nothing provides libopenvas_base.so.9()(64bit) needed by
>>> openvas-gsa-7.0.3-10.fc31.x86_64
> ...
>> Already noted (and first hit in my Google search):
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/QPAAF7E7MH2W2ZIAIKP7BGPO4RQOH7K3/
> And still failing since September.
>
Maintainer probably has other priorities or has lost interest. This could
indicate that there is now something better (for the maintainer's use case),
have a look at https://alternativeto.net/software/openvas/ and
https://linuxsecurity.expert/tools/openvas/ . Openvas is sort of a jack of
all trades, so there may be another tools that is better for your use case.
> As a temporary turnaround it seems that you can install the fc30
> version (not fully tested):
>
> sudo dnf --releasever=30 install openvas-gsa
>
Hi!
Thank you for the answers. Didn't find that 1st link George mentioned,
and reading it quickly didn't really get what to do. I'll look into it
deeper probably tomorrow. Now doing the --releasever=30 gives me this
initially:
Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'updates-modular':
- Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match
like 3 times.
A second attempt seemed to work but is downgrading git, foomatic and a
lot of other perl packages.
Still downloading at this stage but wanted to say thank you and
hopefully everything will be running tomorrow.
Now should I file a bug for F31 or not?
Have you checked bugzilla and the openvas site? If anyone other than
you uses openvas there may already be a bug report with some indication
of the underlying issues. If you decide you need openvas it would be useful
to try either building it directly from source or building your own rpms so you
can document the problems in your bug report. Depending on the nature of
the problem you may find it better to file a bug report with the upstream
developer.
George N. White III
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
