On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 19:11 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 2020-02-03 19:06, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 07:03 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > > > On 2020-02-03 06:24, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 03:41 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > > > > > On 2020-02-03 02:27, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > > > No, the login appears to work, but always shows this pop-up. > > > > > > Nevertheless, nothing seems to be disabled. In fact I often don't > > > > > > notice it because it's behind some other window. It's an annoyance > > > > > > rather than a showstopper. > > > > > In your initial post you said. "the pop-up just talks about "an application needing > > > > > authentication", without saying which application" > > > > > > > > > > That doesn't sound like it has anything to do with mounting. > > > > I agree. > > > > > > > > > If instead of logging in to a KDE session you ssh in or login from a console session > > > > > do you get a request to supply your pw a second time? Is /home mounted when you > > > > > login in that way? > > > > On a fresh boot, logging into a text console with root, /home is > > > > mounted. > > > > > > > > On logging into my KDE session, the pop-up appears. A screenshot can be > > > > seen at: > > > > > > > > https://drive.google.com/open?id=1NqOQLgkf1dqBFd3hp4hhP59-y66kwrf2 > > > > > > > Well, it seems related to udisks2. > > > > > > What processes are running at pids 1942 and 944? > > $ sudo ls -l /proc/944/exe /proc/1942/exe > > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 poc poc 0 Feb 3 11:04 /proc/1942/exe -> /usr/bin/kded5 > > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 0 Feb 3 11:04 /proc/944/exe -> /usr/libexec/udisks2/udisksd > > > > > Shot in the dark....after reading a few, scattered google hits, what happens if you change > > > > > > UUID=c1df25d9-4c89-43a5-886d-3bbbf8513b22 to the actual partition definition? > > I'll try that in a while after I reboot. > > > > OK.... > > The odd thing I see in another answer is the output of mount. It has.... > > /dev/sda5 on /home type ext4 (rw,relatime,seclabel) > > Which seems not to be related to LVM Indeed, curiouser and curiouser. There does appear to be an inconsistency somewhere. poc _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
