On 12/26/19 5:21 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 12/26/19 4:47 PM, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
The bridge is supposed to bridge enp4s0 (it was being named lan1 prior
to the
upgrade to F31) and enp6s1 (was lan2 prior to F31 upgrade).
The messages are for my enp4s0, but it has no IP address. This is via my
iptables setup. I assume this is happening because br0 (that I would
normally
NAT for me) is not up:
Dec 26 15:35:12 umbrella kernel: Input generic reject rule
IN=enp4s0 OUT= MAC=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:90:6e:bb:8d:13:d7:08:00
SRC=0.0.0.0 DST=255.255.255.255 LEN=328 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=128
ID=57005 PROTO=UDP SPT=68 DPT=67 LEN=308
I think you probably had configured lan1 and lan2 in a specific firewall
"zone" but now that the interfaces aren't being renamed, they aren't in
a zone and don't have rules. If you are going to give up on renaming,
you'll want to put those interfaces in the appropriate firewall zone.
I found these in my log files, they look very relevant to my problem,
but I
haven't figured out why they are busy:
...
Dec 26 15:38:50 umbrella systemd-udevd[767]: enp6s1: Failed to
rename network interface 2 from 'enp6s1' to 'lan2': Device or resource
busy
"ip" is your friend. To rename an interface it must be down.
"ip link set enp4s0 down"
"ip link set enp4s0 name eth0"
"ip link set eth0 up"
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
