On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 08:19:47PM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Thu, 26 Dec 2019 16:47:20 -0800 > Patrick Mansfield wrote: > > > or just use enp6s1 and > > enp4s0 for the bridge and not bother renaming them > > Resistance is futile :-). I turn off all the renaming junk > on systems with just one interface so I can continue to get > eth0, but I gave up on systems with multiple interfaces > and just use the strange names the system invents (which works > OK till they change the algorithm and it invents new names > on the same dadgum hardware - that hasn't happened as much > recently as it used to happen). Well that was why I renamed them in the first place - so if the default names changed it would still work :-( The failure was reported here already, see subject "Fc30 -> FC31 : Can't rename interfaces. FC30 worked." He filed this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1777893 -- Patrick _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
