On 2019-12-13 07:14, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Thu, 2019-12-12 at 14:53 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: >> On 12/12/19 2:47 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >>> That's why I suggested posting on the Evo list. The principal devel >>> hangs out there and is usually very responsive. >>> >>>> Dario, the best option would be to file a bug in bugzilla on evolution >>>> requesting to enable it. >>> Or upstream at https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution/issues/ >> I don't understand why either of those options is useful when it's a >> specific flag set in the Fedora spec file. It has nothing to do with >> upstream. > I was referring to the apparent lack of support for TNEF, which would > count as a feature request. I presume the spec file flag is there for a > reason, e.g. that TNEF support is buggy, otherwise why turn it off? Well, that is what https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521662 Suggested. Elsewhere folks talked about cross-scripting vulnerabilities. And further reading suggested that the fixes were not considered adequate by some. IMO, I think it will take a bit of convincing (with proven test cases) for those responsible to accept the change considering the potential security implications. -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
