Ed Greshko wrote: > On 2019-12-10 18:31, Dario Lesca wrote: >> A curiosity: >> >> Why the samba mit/heimdal kerberos is not managed as it >> is done for many other projects in which the packages are >> divided into more sub-packages, like for example >> dovecot-mysql/dovecot-pgsql or samba-vfs-glusterfs /r >> samba-vfs-cephfs, ecc.. > > I do not know the answer to that since I'm not familiar > with the actual packages/packaging. That appears to me to have been covered in the thread Dario started on the devel list last month: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/YBIDUZLHHUHJ4E4VHKJIGFU52CR4Q34B/ It seemed clear to me that the Samba maintainers in Fedora are well-aware of the situation and felt strongly that pushing forward to improve the MIT kerberos support in Samba was the only reasonable path for the distribution to take. So it doesn't seem surprising that they do not build and support Samba with Heimdal kerberos. -- Todd
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
