Re: 'updates-testing' failed ??

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/4/19 8:31 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 11/5/19 12:08 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 11/4/19 5:00 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 16:50:23 -0800
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:

Failed to download metadata for repo 'updates-testing'
Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'updates-testing'

I've been getting this a lot for random different repos.
I usually wait a few minutes and run "dnf makecache" again,
and it works fine.

That fixed one.  Now I got another one:

Maybe they are just busy with FC31 coming out


# dnf makecache
... Metadata cache created.

# dnf --enablerepo=* update
...
Failed to download metadata for repo 'rpmfusion-free-source'

FWIW, I find --enablerepo=* unnecessarily broad.

Indeed!

Have you actually installed any "source" rpms or "debuginfo"
packages?

A few times.  I have also rebuilt SRPMS from Fedora to run on
RHEL/CentOS.  Thank goodness I don't have RHEL/CentOS to deal
with anymore.  My opinion on those guys is rather harsh.


Additionally, one must understand that updating everything from "testing" comes with a degree of risk.

In my experience, not much.  Fedora is very high quality.

In some cases the reason for a package being in "testing" is to fix issues which have been report/discovered. Sometimes, yes rarely, the test package may not fix the issue but break something else.

Haven't seen it, but no doubt it sometime occurs.


On systems I care about I only update from "testing" selectively.



Hi Ed,

Me?  Yes and no.

On my customer's machines, I never use the testing repos.

On my machine, I always want to know what is in the pipeline,
so I enable them all.

The downside is that you have to be careful what repo's you
have installed.   I clean out all repos I am not using.
If in doubt, I do the dnf list with only that repo enabled
to see what I am using from it.  I have found a bunch of
zeros too.  As you said "unnecessarily broad".  Pruning
repo helps that.

And since most of my work comes from Windows, I find the
testing versions from Fedroa to be a bazillion times more
reliable that anything from M$.  Fedora's testing
versions hardly ever goof anything.  And when they do,
they are ridiculously easy to handle: "dnf downgrade"
is your friend.

-T


--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
When you say, "I wrote a program that
crashed Windows," people just stare at
you blankly and say, "Hey, I got those
with the system, for free."
     -- Linus Torvalds
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux