On Tue, 2019-06-04 at 18:54 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 6/1/19 5:27 AM, Garry T. Williams wrote: > > On Friday, May 31, 2019 11:05:20 PM EDT Tim via users wrote: > > > On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 17:18 -0400, Garry Williams wrote: > > > > But, of course, the issue is why this happens in the first place. > > > > > > Does your ISP insert a transparent proxy between you and the > > > internet? They're well known to cause caching problems. > > > > Ah, ha! That is a difference between the problem system and the > > others I have that do not experience the problem. > > > > My employer does eavesdrop on everything. > > I think I found the answer to this. I ran into the same problem with my > simple custom proxy. Starting in F30, the repo uses zchunk. This means > that dnf requests lots of byte ranges. If the proxy doesn't support > this, then librepo fails. According to the http specs, a client MUST > support getting more (or less) data than asked for when requesting > ranges. However, librepo does not. I'm about to file a bug for this. Please do, and please file it against zchunk when you do, but please first make sure you've updated to the latest versions if libdnf, librepo and zchunk-libs. librepo is supposed to automatically reduce the number of zchunk byte ranges it requests if there's a failure, so, if it's not, it's most likely a bug. It would also be really helpful to see how your proxy responds to a request for too many byte ranges. And please make sure to attach dnf.librepo.log when you file the bug. Jonathan _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
