On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 20:32 +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: > On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 13:24 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > On Fri, 31 May 2019 19:58:04 +0200 Franta Hanzlík < > > franta@xxxxxxxxxxx > > > wrote: > > > On Wed, 29 May 2019 18:06:19 -0500 > > > Ranjan Maitra <maitra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I have the following specfile which compiled fine in F29 but is > > > > not able to find references to standard functions in X11, etc > > > > even though the compilation happens without error (outside the > > > > rpmbuild environment). So I am wondering if anyone has some > > > > suggestions on what has changed/is going wrong. > > > > > > > > Here is the spec file: > > > > > > > > $ fpaste thaali.spec > > > > Uploading (1.4KiB)... > > > > https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/3sHHnOdGoM4YHmdzzJRzgQ > > > > > > > > > > > > And here are the messages that I get when I try to build: > > > > > > ... > > > > > > Just an idea - once I had a problem building a program when the > > > make > > > '-j' switch was greater than one. Specifying '-j1' solved it. > > > Unfortunately, I don't even remember the cause or how it > > > manifested > > > itself... > > > > > > > Thanks! So, I use: > > > > %make_build > > > > I replaced this with "make -j1" or also with "make -j" or -j or -j1 > > appended to %make_build. > > > > I don't really understand this, but all of them gave errors. > > > > Thanks again for your help! > > > > Best wishes, > > Ranjan > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Hi Ranjan, > > This is an upstream configure issue. > > 1. I took the pastebin spec file. > 2. Added to spec file: BuildRequires: gcc > 3. Saw spec file does a reconfigure and looked at upstream > configure.ac > 4. Saw it is not correct. Substitute upstream configure.ac for below. > > // Start > > AC_INIT(thaali, 0.4.0) > AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR(src/thaali.c) > AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE > > AM_CONFIG_HEADER(config.h) > > AC_PROG_CC > AC_PATH_X > AC_PATH_XTRA > > dnl Are we going to enable the debugging output ?? > AC_ARG_ENABLE(debug, > AC_HELP_STRING([--enable-debug], [Enable runtime debugging (default: > no)]), > debug=$enableval, debug=no) > > if test "$debug" = yes; then > AC_DEFINE(DEBUG,,[Enable verbose debugging output]) > fi > > dnl Let's do some X testing for... ;-) > if test -n "$x_includes" && test "x$x_includes" != xNONE ; then > CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -I$x_includes" > fi > if test -n "$x_libraries" && test "x$x_libraries" != xNONE ; then > LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -L$x_libraries" > fi > > AC_CHECK_LIB([ICE],[IceOpenConnection],,AC_MSG_ERROR([Can't find > libICE]),) > AC_CHECK_LIB([SM],[SmcOpenConnection],,AC_MSG_ERROR([Can't find > libSM]),) > AC_CHECK_LIB([X11],[XOpenDisplay],,AC_MSG_ERROR([Can't find libX11]), > -L$x_libraries $X_PRE_LIBS) > > AC_SUBST(x_includes) > AC_SUBST(x_libraries) > > AC_OUTPUT([ > Makefile > src/Makefile > ]) > > // End > > Now the RPM builds fine on F30. > > Note this was just a hack to get it to build and show it as an > upstream > issue. You can diff my changes against original configure.ac. To be > honest you have some work ahead as this is all very old and out of > date > both upstream side and how the spec file is constructed. You will > need > to research to fix. > > Regards > > Phil > > Hi, For such a small application, you would vastly simplify things with a build system like meson. Regards Phil -- *** Playing the game for the games sake. *** IRC: kathenas Twitter: kathenasorg Website: https://kathenas.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
