On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 4:21 AM Samuel Sieb <samuel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 5/23/19 3:43 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > dnf seems to have convinced itself that the cache is
> > perfectly up to date no matter how old it is.
> >
> > I now always do the two command sequence:
> >
> > dnf makecache
> > dnf update
> >
> > Less overhead than starting from scratch with "clean all".
>
> Can't you just use "--refresh"?
Nether one of those suggestions gets around the problem I seem to have:
garry@ifr$ sudo dnf makecache;sudo dnf upgrade
Fedora 30 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64 1.3 kB/s | 542 B 00:00
Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Updates 51 kB/s | 16 kB 00:00
Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Updates 84 kB/s | 89 kB 00:01
Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'updates'
Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'updates'
Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Updates 50 kB/s | 16 kB 00:00
Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Updates 2.5 kB/s | 108 kB 00:43
Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'updates'
Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'updates'
garry@ifr$ sudo dnf --refresh upgrade
Fedora 30 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64 2.0 kB/s | 542 B 00:00
Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Updates 130 kB/s | 17 kB 00:00
Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Updates 89 kB/s | 101 kB 00:01
Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'updates'
Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'updates'
garry@ifr$
The only way I found is to clean all. :-(
--
Garry Williams
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
