On 4/19/19 1:39 PM, Phil Wyett wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 2019-04-19 at 13:09 -0400, sean darcy wrote:FC29. I have a server for video encoding. I use x264, which I keep updated to the most recent git packaaged in an rpm. rpm -q x264-libs x264-libs-0.157-0.20190331.fc29.x86_64 I then rebuild all the packages that depend on x264, including avidemux-libs. I just rebuild on my machine, without chaging the version, since the version hasn't changed, it's just linked to the new x264 version. rpm -q avidemux-libs avidemux-libs-2.7.3-1.fc29.x86_64 But dnf want to replace my rebuild version, with the version for the repo: dnf upgrade --refresh .............. Problem 1: package avidemux-libs-2.7.3-1.fc29.x86_64 requires libx264.so.155()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both x264-libs-0.155-2.20180806git0a84d98.fc29.x86_64 and x264-libs-0.157-0.20190331.fc29.x86_64 I don't want to bump the avidemux-libs version, since I want to know when a new one is available. I don't want to keep adding "-x avidemux.." Why does dnf want to replace the installed package ? How does it even know it's not the same package as the repo ? seanHi, You do need to bump in some way. You can... Original: avidemux-libs-2.7.3-1 Your rebuild: avidemux-libs-2.7.3-1.1 Any new version from repo i.e. will be -2 or above and update as normal if/when released. Regards Phil
Good idea, and it worked, thanks. sean _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
