smartmontools issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



fedora 28 up-to-date.

I have a new array, not yet commissioned, and one disk now complains
	Device: /dev/sde [SAT], FAILED SMART self-check. BACK UP DATA NOW!
and the reason, I understand, is this
	ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME          FLAGS    VALUE WORST THRESH FAIL RAW_VALUE
	200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate   PO---K   001   001   001    NOW  0

My issue is that the disk works fine and never had any errors reported.
Also, smartmontools db does not include this disk
	ST12000NM0007-2A1101
and
	update-smart-drivedb
is failing with
	/usr/share/smartmontools/drivedb.h.error.raw: *** BAD signature ***

I know that some disks report funny numbers and smartmontools needs to know which
one to trust. I see a relevant ticket from 2018-06-15....
	https://www.smartmontools.org/attachment/ticket/1042/smartctl-SEAGATE-ST12000NM0007.txt
And I see that smartmontools has other issues with these disks:
	Write SCT (Get) Feature Control Command failed: scsi error badly formed scsi parameters
	Wt Cache Reorder: Unknown (SCT Feature Control command failed)

I ran some short and long smart tests but all failed immediately.
	SMART Extended Self-test Log Version: 1 (1 sectors)
	Num  Test_Description    Status                  Remaining  LifeTime(hours)  LBA_of_first_error
	# 1  Extended offline    Completed: unknown failure    90%       250         0
	# 2  Short offline       Completed: unknown failure    90%       247         0
	# 3  Short offline       Completed: unknown failure    90%       247         0
	# 4  Extended offline    Completed without error       00%        17         -

The other (identical) disks in the array report
	ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME          FLAGS    VALUE WORST THRESH FAIL RAW_VALUE
	200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate   PO---K   100   100   001    -    0

I can request a replacement, but want to ensure that this is not just a smart software issue which
may pop up again on another disk.

Should we have smartmontools v7.0 (released end of last year) by now? It includes this disk.

As I mentioned, the array is not yet commissioned and I can afford to fiddle with it for a while.

TIA

--
Eyal at Home (fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux