On 3/31/19 4:51 PM, David Dusanic wrote:
Fedora is 'unstable' in the sense of changing versions and adding new
features on top of the latest release. CentOS/RHEL stays on fixed
versions for a long time period giving you that kind of stability
without change that enterprises want.
I think the work unstable gets misinterpreted at lot in this context
as you pointed out. It does not mean crashing.
That would mean that if your program actually works on such on
out of date system, that you would be loath to make any improvements
to your program over fear of it breaking and RHEL is very, very
slow (seven years or more) to fix anything.
Fedora is a Kaisen operating system and RHEL is an anti-Kaisen
operating system. You pick which works for you. If you plan to
make improvements to your program, then Fedora is the way to
go as Fedora actually fixes things.
RHEL would be great for a set and forget appliance. But you can do that
with any OS by disabling the updates.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
