On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 10:55:54AM -0700, home user via users wrote: > > Yes. Fonts are delivered in RPM packages which, to DNF, look like > > any packaged software. It's probably that fonts don't _tend_ to > > change a lot. I know I've seen updates to them in the past. > > Thank-you, Matthew. So it's very unlikely that I've missed a patch. > Back in January 2017, in Red Hat's Bugzilla, I submitted bug 1415322 > against the cjkuni-ukai-fonts in hopes of getting an incorrect > Chinese character corrected. At the recommendation of the assignee, > I also filed bug 315606 in cjkunifonts-Bugs, apparently a part of > alioth.debian.org. Now I can't find the site to see the status of > the bug. (I can view bug 1415322.) How do I view bug 315606? When > are these bugs going to be fixed? Ah, I see. The Fedora package maintainer would like the problem fixed in the font itself, not as a one-off patch. That makes sense -- that way it gets fixed for everyone in the world, not just Fedora. However, it looks like that project might be dead upstream? That is, it never migrated from Debian's old tracker to the new one, and the mailing list for it https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cjkunifonts-devel does not seem to exist either. I'd suggest mentioning all this in your existing Red Hat Bugzilla bug, and hopefully then the Fedora package maintainer can help figure out what to do next. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
