On Wednesday, January 9, 2019 7:48:24 AM EST wwp wrote: > True, but you may also fail at upgrading (see the users ML) and it > means possibly fail every 6 months ;-). You cannot be serious in > recommending Fedora for a server in production, just because it has > up-to-date software without mentioning that it would bring fresh fixes, > yes, but also fresh bugs. And that's not what I'd recommend to > handle a server in production, unless you are both the user and the > admin and it's your own home/office and your responsibility only > involves you and no real cost if something goes wrong. Or, unless your > hardware requires kernel (and more) support that is only found in > Fedora, which is another important detail (for instance, you might fail > w/ CentOS7 or Redhat7 on fresh hardware). I would definitely suggest Fedora for production servers, but this is another conversation entirely. I'd be happy to discuss this with you in a separate thread. -- John M. Harris, Jr. <johnmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Splentity https://splentity.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
