Re: unwanted checks for updates.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'm finally back to this.  Here, I'll respond to the apper part.

(Ed said)
> apper is packagekit based. ... This is the first time I've
> seen you mention apper.
(and Samuel said)
> Right. ... anything that depends on PackageKit won't work. ...
> dnf does not require PackageKit, but Apper and Gnome Software do.
> By unmaking it, you allowed them to dbus activate them. You
> might end up getting update requests again.

I occasionally use apper to look for things. But I want to use dnf and nothing else for installs, patches, and updates.

I (re-)masked packagekit.service, rebooted, and launched apper. Just for testing purposes, I searched for "calculator". I get a pop-up error saying "An internal system error has occurred - Apper". When I click the pop-up's "Details >>" button, I see the following message: "Unit packagekit.service is masked.". Trying to launch Software results in a pop-up with the following message:
---------------
"Unable to get list of updates: failed to get updates for refresh: Error calling StartServiceByName for org.freedesktop.PackageKit: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.systemdl.UnitMasked: Unitpackagekit.service is masked."
---------------
These confirm what Ed and Samuel say about apper and Software being dependent on PackageKit. The problem is that now it looks to me like apper and Software cannot be used to find to find tools and apps without also checking for updates. Am I correct? How do I make these tools useful for searching without them checking for updates?

Several times this year, while doing weekly patches (dnf upgrade --refresh), a little window slid down from the top of the display (where date and time are shown) indicating a problem. When I looked at the details, it was a crash or abort of PackageKit. I clicked the button in the problem reporter to submit a bug on this. The problem had already been reported by many other people. I believe the main bug is #1480846 (see "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480846";, comment 68). Despite these problems, the patches did seem to complete successfully. So I'm not really clear on what you mean when you say that dnf does not depend on PackageKit.

On to trying the timer suggestions.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux