On 12/12/18 7:15 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > traceroute beartooth.info > traceroute -I beartooth.info > traceroute -T -p 999 beartooth.info > > Some (or all) or those might require root, so best to just use root. I was able to get the failure condition again. This is from a working system.... [root@acer egreshko]# traceroute -n -T -p 999 beartooth.info traceroute to beartooth.info (208.100.51.176), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 211.75.128.254 6.136 ms 6.076 ms 6.208 ms 2 168.95.229.46 6.158 ms 6.078 ms 6.025 ms 3 220.128.27.94 6.525 ms 6.485 ms 6.437 ms 4 220.128.7.69 6.788 ms 220.128.14.93 6.325 ms 220.128.7.69 6.675 ms 5 220.128.30.253 14.755 ms 14.658 ms 220.128.6.85 6.458 ms 6 211.72.108.81 154.862 ms 154.813 ms 211.72.108.49 144.515 ms 7 202.39.83.45 152.368 ms 202.39.83.77 152.717 ms 152.691 ms 8 4.28.172.121 166.896 ms 4.28.172.129 144.516 ms 142.168 ms 9 * * * 10 4.71.248.202 195.003 ms 205.495 ms 193.438 ms 11 208.100.32.35 301.100 ms 205.363 ms 215.205 ms 12 216.86.153.98 205.625 ms 215.884 ms 215.802 ms 13 208.100.51.176 203.412 ms 215.869 ms 189.607 ms [root@acer egreshko]# host 208.100.51.176 176.51.100.208.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer artemis.beartooth.info. And this is from a failing one... [root@meimei ~]# traceroute -n -T -p 999 beartooth.info traceroute to beartooth.info (208.100.51.176), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 192.168.1.1 1.198 ms 0.321 ms 0.454 ms 2 211.75.128.254 8.701 ms 8.184 ms 9.475 ms 3 168.95.229.46 9.358 ms 10.435 ms 7.877 ms 4 220.128.27.94 10.369 ms 9.341 ms 10.332 ms 5 220.128.14.93 8.145 ms 8.735 ms 9.284 ms 6 220.128.6.81 10.359 ms * 9.139 ms 7 211.72.108.5 153.147 ms 211.72.108.49 148.277 ms 211.72.108.5 153.197 ms 8 202.39.83.45 141.591 ms 144.909 ms 202.39.83.77 169.003 ms 9 4.28.172.121 148.228 ms 144.076 ms 4.28.172.129 154.525 ms 10 * * * 11 4.71.248.202 216.858 ms 202.435 ms 216.704 ms 12 208.100.32.35 216.585 ms 202.665 ms 216.622 ms 13 216.86.153.98 216.773 ms 216.103 ms 216.158 ms 14 * * * 15 * * * 16 * * * 17 * * * 18 * * * 19 * * * 20 * * * 21 * * * 22 * * * 23 * * * 24 * * * 25 * * * 26 * * * 27 * * * 28 * * * 29 * * * 30 * * * FWIW, I think I triggered the "defensive" response by doing a port scan on 208.100.51.176. I will check again in a few hours, but I think the defense may drop after a time. -- Right: I dislike the default color scheme Wrong: What idiot picked the default color scheme _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
