Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sun, 2018-10-21 at 08:16 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: >> Are you aware that is already the case for this mailing list? >> >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > That in my view is the perfect argument for not doing this. Hello Kitty > (soooorrrrrry, HyperKitty) is harder to use, has a clunky interface > with huge amounts of wasted space, and is significantly less > functional. Amusingly enough, I'd say similar things about Evolution as a long-time user of Mutt. ;) I share your feelings about the list web interface, but I think that instead of being an argument against having such an interface, it's a sign that there are many types of users and the more power each of us has to interact with each other using our preferred tools, the better. It's simply an argument against moving to any sort of one-size-fits-all software. > And apparently the current proposal doesn't even include this second- > rate option. I think it's worth noting that there is no proposal. It was simply a tangent in a discussion on the devel list (which was started to ask Gmail users to not send HTML mail to the list). -- Todd ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Ninety percent of everything is crap. -- Sturgeon's Law
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
