On Wed, 2018-08-01 at 09:06 +0200, Frank Elsner wrote: > On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 08:50:27 +0200 Frank Elsner wrote: > > On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 23:15:57 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote: > > > On 07/31/2018 10:57 PM, Frank Elsner wrote: > > > > Can you please explain the line > > > > 2018-08-01T05:53:36Z INFO Installed: kernel-4.17.9-200.fc28.i686 > > > > from /var/log/dnf.rpm.log of my 32bit F28 system? > > > > > > What is there to explain? That is version 4.17.9 of the kernel, 32-bit > > > non-PAE, built for F28. > > > Do you have more than 4GB of RAM in the computer? > > > > Ok, my fault. This old system with 2GB runs a non-PAE kernel. > > > > But on my TP x230i with 8GB running F28 file /var/log/dnf.rpm.log shows > > 2018-07-23T08:41:52Z INFO Installed: kernel-PAE-4.17.7-100.fc27.i686 > > ^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Forget this. That was before the upgrade to F28. Overlooked that > > > And yumex shows kernel-4.17.9-200.fc28 for arch i686 available in updates repo. > > So, my question is: What could prevent dnf from offering this version for update? > > This question is still awaiting an answer. I don't use yumex, but if it's looking in the yum database while dnf looks in the dnf one, there could be an inconsistency. Just a thought. poc _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/WSZD5OBN4IEULU5QIRF6X3FSP4Q2VH4Q/
