Re: Screen goes dark when booting latest kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/13/18 10:47, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 6:16 PM, Ed Greshko <ed.greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 06/13/18 04:45, Alex wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I have a fedora27 system on an older x86_64 machine and when booting
>>> the latest kernel (I believe it was just released today) as well as
>>> the previous two, the display goes dark and becomes unresponsive.
>>>
>>> I've booted into the rescue kernel (an older 3.14 from fc21) to get it
>>> back online.
>>> $ uname -a
>>> Linux localhost 3.17.4-301.fc21.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Nov 27 19:09:10 UTC
>>> 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>>
>>> All other current kernels failed.
>>>
>>> How do I troubleshoot this?
>>>
>>> Based on the output from journalctl, it appears to be something
>>> related with gnome and/or packagekit and/or the display driver. Here's
>>> a few select error messages that look like they could be the cause.
>>> I've also uploaded the journalctl boot entry that I believe is
>>> associated with this boot to pastebin:
>>>
>>> https://pastebin.com/804NfcEB
>>>
>> This does not appear to be a journal from a failed boot.
> My apologies; can we try again?
>
> https://pastebin.com/BjKf0Kdt

That can't be a "crash" either because....


Jun 12 15:52:27 localhost systemd[1]: Reached target Graphical Interface.

The Graphic Target has been reached...

Jun 12 15:52:28 localhost systemd[1]: Startup finished in 2.883s (kernel) + 4.719s
(initrd) + 1min 44.210s (userspace) = 1min 51.812s.

The startup is complete.

Jun 12 15:52:29 localhost dbus-daemon[1431]: [session uid=1000 pid=1426] Successfully
activated service 'org.gnome.evolution.dataserver.Calendar7'
Jun 12 15:52:29 localhost dbus-daemon[1430]: [session uid=1000 pid=1427] Successfully
activated service 'org.gnome.evolution.dataserver.Calendar7'

UID 1000 seems to be set for automatic login and evolution processes are starting.

Jun 12 15:52:35 localhost sshd[2954]: Invalid user tech from 42.99.180.167 port 57531

And sshd is running and someone has tried to login....

> Is it possible the system crashes prior to logging? I'm assuming the
> current boot is 0, which is the rescue kernel. The previous boot was
> the crash with the latest kernel, so I'm assuming that's -1, which is
> what's posted in the pastebin above.

Yes, it is possible you won't get to logging....

If you look at the very start of a boot you should see something like this...

[egreshko@acer ~]$ journalctl -b | more
- Logs begin at Fri 2017-11-24 06:58:33 CST, end at Wed 2018-06-13 11:05:48 CST. -
-
Jun 13 10:38:19 acer.greshko.com kernel: microcode: microcode updated early to revi
sion 0xa4, date = 2010-10-02
Jun 13 10:38:19 acer.greshko.com kernel: Linux version 4.16.14-300.fc28.x86_64 (moc
kbuild@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) (gcc version 8.1.1 20180502 (Red Hat 8.1.1
-1) (GCC)) #1 SMP Tue Jun 5 16:23:44 UTC 2018
Jun 13 10:38:19 acer.greshko.com kernel: Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-4.16.14-
300.fc28.x86_64 root=/dev/mapper/fedora_acer-root ro rd.lvm.lv=fedora_acer/root rd.
lvm.lv=fedora_acer/swap rhgb quiet nouveau.modeset=0 rd.driver.blacklist=nouveau vi
deo=vesa:off LANG=en_US.UTF-8
Jun 13 10:38:19 acer.greshko.com kernel: x86/fpu: x87 FPU will use FXSAVE
Jun 13 10:38:19 acer.greshko.com kernel: e820: BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
Jun 13 10:38:19 acer.greshko.com kernel: BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x00000
0000009f7ff] usable


>
>> Your subject seems to imply that you never get to login screen at either a graphical
>> or run level 3 boot.
> Yes, that's correct. There are a lot of "failure" and other "fail"
> errors including "Failed to get current display".
>
>> Suggest you also edit your boot parameters to remove "rhgb" and "quiet" to watch the
>> boot process more closely.
> I've done that now. This is actually a friend's computer, located
> about 30 miles away, so I can't reboot it very easily without making
> sure he's there to monitor.

OK.  Someone has to be at the system to see exactly what is going on....

>
> Samuel Sieb wrote:
>> Can you access it remotely using ssh?
> No, it's completely catatonic - no ping, no ssh, no disk activity.

And, as you can see from the above, the info you've put on pastebin shows sshd to be
running and accepting connections.


-- 
Conjecture is just a conclusion based on incomplete information. It isn't a fact.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/5BHX4BB2NYPIVHYOMXID5MVKA3DRJ3OG/
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux