Re: Any way to disable debugsource generation on fedora >= 27

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 12:08 AM, Todd Zullinger <tmz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Robin Lee wrote:
>> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Todd Zullinger <tmz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Robin Lee wrote:
>>>> I recently upgrade my host from f26 to f28. But to keep compatible
>>>> with old behavior,
>>>> I am figuring out a way to revert the change 'Separate Subpackage and
>>>> Source Debuginfo'[1].
>>>> That means let rpm not generate debugsource and subpackage debuginfo.
>>>> Simply adding '%_debugsource_packages 0' to ~/.rpmmacros does not work.
> [...]
>> It doest not work with _debugsource_packages set to 0.
>
> Indeed.  I played around for a bit last night, to no avail.
>
> It's not clear to me from the rpm documentation, source
> comments, or git history whether this is intentional or not.
> It may be a case that wasn't tested.  Or it could be
> intended that it's turned on at the distro level and can
> only be disabled in individual packages.  That would help
> improve reproducibility.
>
> I think you'd have to ask the rpm maintainers about this to
> be sure.
>
> I'm still not clear on why you want to do this.  I know I
> don't need to know that.  I'm curious mostly and knowing
> why this is a problem might help someone here see another
> way to solve it. :)
I am using the planex[1] tool to do massive rpm rebuild.
It use something like 'rpm -q --specfile' to predict the result
rpms, and generate a dependency tree. And then use this info to
build rpms in el7 mock one by one.

I then use the ''%_debugsource_template %{nil}' trick, which can
satisfy planex by now.

[1] https://github.com/xenserver/planex
>
> Is the goal to build binary, non-noaarch packages on f28
> that you can use on older releases -- including the
> debuginfo?  That seems unlikely to be ideal, but I'm
> guessing at your use-case.
>
> If it's just curiosity, then I understand.  Sorry I can't
> help with a better answer in that case.  I can at least
> confirm that it doesn't appear to be a macro you can
> override short of changing the setting in the system-wide
> macros file or individual spec file. :)
>
> --
> Todd
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> If age imparted wisdom, there wouldn't be any old fools.
>     -- Claudia Young
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux