On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 20:16 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 04/10/18 19:30, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > I've recently started experimenting with Borg as a deduplicating > > backup system ('dnf install borgbackup'). Think 'duplicity' on steroids. > > However there are many quite complex configuration options and a number > > of efforts exist to make things simpler for the average user, especially > > when setting up an automated backup regime (the only kind of backup > > that's worth a candle of course). > > > > One of these is a Python3 script called Borgmatic (https://torsion.org/ > > borgmatic/), which is easy to install using pip3 but needs some minor > > tweaking to run on Fedora (it installs in /usr/local/bin, which is not > > in the default PATH for sudo). It would be much more elegant if this > > could be done as a proper Fedora package and installed in /usr/bin. > > I've been in touch with the creator and although he has no issue with > > this happening he's not a Fedora user himself. I'm not volunteering to > > do it either because a) I have no experience of package creation and > > maintenance, and b) Borg itself is already maintained as part of > > Fedora, so the logical step would be for the Fedora maintainer to take > > it on. What is the approved process for suggesting this? > > > > > > I don't know the "official or approved" process but looking in koji I see that > Benjamin Pereto <benjamin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> is doing all the builds and appears in the > changelog. So, being the dummy I am I'd email him. :-) :-) OK, I had just looked at 'rpm -qi ...' which is less specific. I'll do that. poc _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx